drift between csup/cvs, noisy updates, making it more efficient to keep up-to-date..
George Michaelson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I found cvs tiresome, and switched to csup. But then I noticed csup wasn't updating where I read mirror, so I tried the trivial switch back. Its a very noisy cut between csup and cvs. heaps of stuff appeared to have fallen out of CVS maintenance. Probably, what I am trying to do is silly, but it does occur to me comment that the modality of access sure appears to effect *what* you get, rather than how you get it, or how timely you see updates. Shouldn't we be moving to a situation where the modality of access is mostly immaterial, and if you want CVS, you get it, be it by rsync, or ftp, or csup or .. So, am I missing something? is/are there some well known tricks to make it easier to be 'agile' about *how* you get NetBSD current, which don't make such impact on *what* you get? (the one I know about is to run a find script over the CVS/Root files, hard-linking o they are all one file, which I have been told can make some stuff more efficient) -George