Re: DMA mode selection question

Quentin Garnier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.help
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:40:18PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've got an older i386 (PI) with an IDE drive that supports Ultra33, and
> for which NetBSD (3.1) aggrees yet sets the drive to the next mode down:
> 
> # dmesg | grep wd0
> wd0 at atabus0 drive 0: <FUJITSU MPB3043ATU>
> wd0: drive supports 16-sector PIO transfers, LBA addressing
> wd0: 4125 MB, 8940 cyl, 15 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 8448300 sectors
> wd0: 32-bit data port
> wd0: drive supports PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 (Ultra/33)
> wd0(piixide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2 (using DMA)
> boot device: wd0
> root on wd0a dumps on wd0b
> 
> The IDE controller is an on-board Intel 82371SB IDE Interface (PIIX3)
> (rev. 0x00) and the IDE cable is a std 40-pin/40-conductor which should
> be fine up to Ultra33 speeds.  The kernel is just a paired down GENERIC
> with the wd(4) flag set to 0x0000 ( uses whatever mode the drive says it
> supports). Any idea why the drivve isn't getting the highest supported
> setting?

Well, because the IDE controller doesn't support it...

-- 
Quentin Garnier - [email protected] - [email protected]
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 478 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRhLC1dgoQloHrPnoAQKgmggAn1Ye2cox6A//uVK2VBxxu/wLBVaB1lUF
b33GubgO00o/4ll1nXCQOYmcMA+8AGC5DuictGMMDvKK7aOC7TLSIzYW15GF2U8s
CvUzBFMOVoZ2tlX5LMu1hYLvtXtwhvc+NXRBkXYAqqRtY6BtR/niCltWJSzKu9lS
8WCiB6n+nI/HohCzhx65bzC8Vfeplec439wdT2nxsB5NjpRn9SZtihn+EhVMgwTl
jHa0boVRQMnqTYvKzJ4pWRCSSXl5cq3yIhYTXoxCl877rXBvOWbi/DIQN05TmyyZ
ROhkA6fSzlGL2JMiBYdwDSNa+YIQ1NV1Lcq+fZv5Eh7xDrr0k1kc3Q==
=muVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.