Re: Adding /usr/local to daily security audit

Jeff_W<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.help,gmane.os.netbsd.general
Message-ID <4684b915.Tyt3QUBTvVli8ybF%[email protected]>
"Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also sprach Jeff_W ([email protected])
> > Is there an easy way? Mainly just want to check the binaries, libraries
> > and config files under /usr/local.  Doesn't need to be at the same level
> > as the default /usr/pkg audit, maybe just daily checks of
> > /usr/local/{bin,etc,libexec}, log diffs and generate/check checksums.  As
> > near as I can tell I'd probably need to create something in
> > /etc/security.local and maybe a permissions category under /etc/mtree/.
> > But I'm not sure.  Maybe there's an easier way.  Didn't see anything that
> > seemed relevant on netbsd.org; maybe someone knows of other online
> > resources that cover this topic?
>
> As far as I understood, you want to check the integrity of files
> residing under /usr/local. 
>
> You can use mtree(8) to check the integrity, it creates a database of
> files and their attributes, including checksums. 
>
> To do automatic checking, enable "run_security=YES" in /etc/daily.conf
> and "check_mtree=YES" in /etc/security.conf, if they aren't enabled
> already. 


Yup - those are the defaults in /etc/defaults/[daily|security].conf


> Mtree uses the databases (which are plain text files) in /etc/mtree/.
> If you want to add /usr/local to the list of hierarchies to check, do
> sth. like:
>
> # mtree -L -c -K sha1,rmd160,gid,uid,mode -p /usr/local > \
     /etc/usrlocal.secure

How does the system know it's now supposed to check /usr/local during its
daily security audit?  Don't you need to add/create entries in
/etc/mtree/special or /etc/mtree/special.local ?  That was the impression
I got from security.conf(5).


> To do a manual check, run:
> # mtree -L -p /usr/local -f /etc/usrlocal.secure

I guess this could be added to /etc/security.local as an alternative
to cron.  Thing is, I really only care about the a few of the files
under /usr/local - binaries and config files mainly.  For instance,
I've built Pike, the programming language, which has a whole lot of
modules and libraries under /usr/local/pike/7.6.112/ .  I'd rather
not worry about most of that stuff, just the four Pike executables
and maybe the core modules.  It looks like that's what the "special"
files are for, no?

-Jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.