Re: Somebody got a scanner to work with xsane?

"D. Aubril" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.help
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sigmund Skjelnes wrote:
> Hi, all!
> Do somebody got xsane working?
A couple of months ago, it happened that my epson 3590 worked. Once in a 
while.
>
> I'd has an Canon CanoScan N650U USB scanner, the kernel finds it, and 
> the sane-find-scanner ( as root ) says ther are a scanner there, but 
> is unable to determine what scanner it is. Somewhere in the docs I'd 
> read that sane-find-scanner do not work properly with NetBSD, and the 
> backend have to be set up manually. I'd have tried to set up plustek, 
> this should be the proper backend, but to no use. Xsane could not open 
> the device. I'd had to be root, some access rights may not have ben 
> set properly. I'd has not tried to get the rights proper yet, I don't 
> think that will alter anything else than whos able to access the usb 
> device. I'd have searched for some docs for how to do this, but has'nt 
> found anything besides a number of people which have the same problem, 
> and a person who claims that it's Canon's fault all the way, they're 
> not giving avay info needed to make a proper driver.
Don't know about the driver. for the rights, see 
http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux. The forth paragraph says :

The device files used by libusb are located in /proc/bus/usb/
(e.g. /proc/bus/usb/001/003) or in /dev/bus/usb/ (e.g. /dev/bus/usb/001/003), if
you use udev.  The exact file name can be found out by running sane-find-scanner
which would print "libusb:001:003" in this case.  While setting permissions with
e.g. "chmod a+rw /proc/bus/usb/001/003" works, this change is not permanent...

>
> Hope somebody could help.
>
> Cincerely,
> Sigmund
>
Best Regards,
David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.