Re: Somebody got a scanner to work with xsane?
"D. Aubril" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sigmund Skjelnes wrote: > Hi, all! > Do somebody got xsane working? A couple of months ago, it happened that my epson 3590 worked. Once in a while. > > I'd has an Canon CanoScan N650U USB scanner, the kernel finds it, and > the sane-find-scanner ( as root ) says ther are a scanner there, but > is unable to determine what scanner it is. Somewhere in the docs I'd > read that sane-find-scanner do not work properly with NetBSD, and the > backend have to be set up manually. I'd have tried to set up plustek, > this should be the proper backend, but to no use. Xsane could not open > the device. I'd had to be root, some access rights may not have ben > set properly. I'd has not tried to get the rights proper yet, I don't > think that will alter anything else than whos able to access the usb > device. I'd have searched for some docs for how to do this, but has'nt > found anything besides a number of people which have the same problem, > and a person who claims that it's Canon's fault all the way, they're > not giving avay info needed to make a proper driver. Don't know about the driver. for the rights, see http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux. The forth paragraph says : The device files used by libusb are located in /proc/bus/usb/ (e.g. /proc/bus/usb/001/003) or in /dev/bus/usb/ (e.g. /dev/bus/usb/001/003), if you use udev. The exact file name can be found out by running sane-find-scanner which would print "libusb:001:003" in this case. While setting permissions with e.g. "chmod a+rw /proc/bus/usb/001/003" works, this change is not permanent... > > Hope somebody could help. > > Cincerely, > Sigmund > Best Regards, David