Re: another stupid question
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:17:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
GENERIC is more likely to be ok with 4.0 than it was with say 1.6, so I'd advise at least trying it. I'm not sure about the sources. What I'd do is pull from anonymous cvs with one of the following tags (e.g., use "-r netbsd-4" on your checkout): netbsd-4-0-RELEASE the release, exactly netbsd-4-0 security fix branch for 4.0 netbsd-4 stable branch for 4 (4.1 will be from this some day) It's perfectly ok to have a slightly newer kernel from the netbsd-4 or netbsd-4-0 branches than your userland. The branch rules are more or less bug and security fixes only, no structural changes, no ABI/API changes. I use tags like netbsd-4 on production machines, and update both userland and kernel from source. (While technically it's required to have a newer kernel than user, I find that along a stable branch I can install both and reboot with no trouble. When jumping branches I always install the kernel and reboot and then install userland.) So I would suggest that you build a kernel from the netbsd-4 branch.