Re: Multi-processor?
Anthony Hilton <[email protected]> Wed, 7 May 2003 21:22:17 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.acorn32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <URL:news:local.netbsd.acorn32> on Wed 07 May, Ben Harris wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2003, Anthony Hilton wrote: > > > In <URL:news:local.netbsd.acorn32> on Wed 07 May, Ben Harris wrote: > > > In article <[email protected]> you write: > > > >I saw on Drobe yesterday, and in csa.announce today that Simtec have a > > > >clearance sale (see http://www.simtec.co.uk/products/clearance/) > > > >inculding Hydra multi-processor cards for ukp50 (+VAT and carriage). > > > > > > > >Can NetBSD/acorn32 make use of multi processors using the Hydra card? > > > > > > No. Well, if you use code from the bjh21-hydra branch, you might be > > > able to spin up the slave processors and run some kernel code on them, > > > but that's about it. > > > > There are better ways to spend 50 quid on ARM kit then. > > Yep. Don't forget that you need CPU cards as well (though mine were only > a quid a throw). > > > Is hydra capable of takin SA-110 processor cards or is it tied to ARM6/7 > > processors? > > I believe that the last versions of the Hydra FPGAs support SA-110s, but > making them work with NetBSD would be even harder because they've got > write-back caches (and ISTR they don't work quite right in write-through > mode). > > > How about Kinetic cards? > > Again, I expect they'd work, but you'd then have /n/ CPUs each with > their own memory, but sharing an I/O system. Not really an SMP at all, > and certainly not something NetBSD can currently run on. I thought as much from your first response. Thank you for taking the time to respond to my obviously niaive questions and suggestions. Anthony -- [email protected]