Re: Boot netbsd 2.0 on RiscPC
Peter Teichmann <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:33:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.acorn32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Samstag, 26. März 2005 02:13 schrieb David Brownlee: > So to clarify - both the 2.0 !BtNetBSD using boot32, and > direct use of the 2.0 boot32 fail for you, but work with > an earlier BtNetBSD? They do not work with boot32 as supplied with NetBSD 2.0 (well, they work sometimes, but very seldom, maybe 1 out of 30 tries), and do work with btnetbsd, both v1.4 2004/0/24 as supplied with 2.0, and 1.5 2002/03/24 as supplied with the btnetbsd-0.99a archive (both did never fail). > > Anyway, i tried it with several combinations of the following 6 SIMMs: > > > > SIMM A,B: 32MB, with 2 banks 16MB each (the original ones) > > SIMM C,D: 32MB, with 2 banks 16MB each (different type) > > SIMM E,F: 64MB, with 1 bank of 64MB > > > > Needless to say, all SIMMS were stable in the machines they were in > > originally. BtNetBSD was able to boot with any combinations of them. > > > > Boot32 was only able to boot with SIMM C or D in any of the slots, but > > not with both of them. It failed with any other combinations I tried. > > > > How can we explain this? > > That is very strange. Could you look at the messages boot32 > gives (load an invalid kernel - README works quite well :) > and see if they are any different between one of C/D and > one of A/B? It could be that one difference beetween the SIMMs is that one could be EDO and the other FPM, but I do not know which is what. The 64MB ones are quite sure EDO. Would that make a difference? Could you give me a hint where I can find "load an invalid kernel - README"? I guess I can find there information how to preserve the boot32 messages, because they go away too fast if booting works. Peter Teichmann