Re: Removing ARCNET stuffs
Tyler Retzlaff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.amiga |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/28/2015 12:39 PM, Robert Swindells wrote: > Radoslaw Kujawa <[email protected]> wrote: > > The same arguments might be made against the plan to remove ATM > support. I've got no problem with keeping it, removing it isn't really intellectually rewarding I thought it more of a cleanup/chore that nobody really wanted to do. I only suggested removal because I know the code is broken. I guess we could at least make it compile again if we kept it and add it to the ALL kernels. Is that enough? It's likely to still be broken and difficult to efficiently fix without any hardware though. I admit if I had en(4) hardware to test with I would have spent the time. Maybe someone has this hardware? rtr