Re: AmigaOne X5000
Al Zick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.amiga |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Mar 3, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Swift Griggs wrote: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Al Zick wrote: >> The AmigaOne X5000 is out! In fact, I have one. > > Sweet! Congrats, Al. I took a look at the deals at Amiga on the > Lake and it was pretty pricey. I want to say it's like $1500 - > $1900 USD depending on options, but I might be misremembering. It's > just a tad too rich for my blood. However, I'm still really > interested. The less expensive version is supposed to be out soon. > Does it have an FPGA on board like the X1000 did? I've wondered if > they added that so you could drop some VHDL or whatever and > reproduce an "real" legacy Amiga in those gates, then funnel 68k > through that layer rather than having to always resort to UAE. Is > that possible with the AX5K? I am not really sure. >> It seems fast, but AmigaOS doesn't give it much of a work out. > > Yeah, it's definitely a case of hardware outpacing software. The > post-Commodore era has sucked. IIRC, only Escom was the last non- > Commodore company able to actually produce a "real" Amiga. > Everything else has turned out to be a tease or a dirty lie. So, my > hat is off to the A-EON guys for the work. My only regret is that > it looks like a cheap PC in a crappy case. Mine looks really bad. I put it into an old PC case with a Dell keyboard, and monitor. I guess it would give people a real surprise if they booted it up and I wasn't there. > The other sad fact was that the M68k line sorta died. Yeah, sure > Coldfire was pretty close, but still not pin or microcode > compatible. Bummer. I put a lot of work into learning the 68k in > the '030 era when it had become fully 32 bit. In my (albeit > limited) experience, I found it to be very comfortable to program on. This is sad. I really like 68k. It seems to me there was a was a Coldfire cpu that they based an accelerator card on for the Atari. I am not sure how well it worked, but from what I read it had a system to trap 68060 instructions and run it through an emulator. >> I did try installing NetBSD on it with Bochs. Here it is in the >> installer: http://datazap.net/sites/14/Bochsinstall.jpg I think it >> is only using 1 core. > > You are emulating x86 though, right? Cool screenshot. I *am* jealous. Yes, I am emulating x86. >> It looks like there maybe a new PowerPC notebook:http:// >> www.powerpc-notebook.org/en/ > > Huh, and they are made by A-Cube, too. The same folks who make the > SAM460. Cool. I hope it makes it to production. If it looked > halfway cool and could run AmigaOS, that'd be the culmination of a > longtime dream since Commodore never produced a portable Amiga. > However, it looks like those folks are concentrating on Linux. Yes, they do seem to concentrate on Linux. I would rather see them use NetBSD. >> Also, Servergy has built a new PowerPC server: http:// >> www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1262676 > > I saw that come out, too. It's hella expensive, though. I can't > remember but I just remember a sharp inhalation of breath when I > saw the $$$. >> There maybe other PowerPC system too. I know that they plan on >> building 2 more versions of the X5000. > >> The problem is that Debian may drop support for PPC: > > That's okay. I've dropped support for Debian. So have a lot of > folks now that Devuan Beta 1 has been so stable and successful. > Post systemd distros who downed the poison pill with a big jar of > Lennart's cool aid are dead to me. Dead forever - no more chances > after that fiasco. > >> http://tenfourfox.blogspot.ae/2016/11/debian-drops-powerpc.html >> The author of this article believe like me that NetBSD needs to be >> ported to the new PowerPC system. There must be someone who can >> port to this system. > > Well, if it does happen to garner NetBSD support I'd probably buy > one myself. I wish I was rich, and I could buy a couple of > interested kernel devs their own rig to work with. I really hope that NetBSD is ported to it. It sounds like NetBSD already supports the single core processor - the e500, but I believe the system I have has an e500mc. > Anyhow, I hope you enjoy your new machine. If you happen to write > up any blogs or other experiences with it, shoot them to the list > or to me. I'd love to hear about your experience. I want to try booting a NetBSD kernel with e500 support and I will let you know how it goes. -Al