Re: X.org and A1200 AGA Graphics
David Brownlee <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Sep 2021 13:00:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.amiga |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6paq7WM5nAmQ97Wkp9POzwd8J+CO-MvQC3pCpvrj5G0oRw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Frank Wille <[email protected]> wrote: > > Daniel Doran wrote: > > > I have not attempted a NetBSD install on my Amiga 1200 yet but I was > > told there was not X.org graphics support for the Amiga 1200 in 9.2, is > > that right? > > Unfortunately that's true. With the transition from XFree to X.org, a few > years ago, all the X drivers for the Amiga hardware became useless, and > there doesn't seem to be enough man power and motivation to recreate > everything in the same quality again. > > I adapted some graphics card drivers to support wsfb(4), so X.org can at > least use a dumb frame buffer on them. But in the past we even had hardware > acceleration. Someone really needs to get an Amiga to macallan@ - he has hardware acceleration for oddball sun framebuffers, including antialiased console fonts :) > > If so is there anyway to get X Windows going on an Amiga A1200? > > Not without a supported graphics card. Nobody implemented wsfb(4) for the > Amiga's native chipset yet. > > As far as I remember it is also not so easy to implement wsfb for AGA, > because of the planar display hardware. Maybe monochrome could be done > without too much effort... I think the difference between nothing and monochrome would be worth it - particularly as it should be faster moving less memory around (though would it be a single colour option (all green?)) > You would probably need a new Xamiga, based on X.org, which is a lot of > work. Maybe start with wsfb, and then someone can always extend it. I'm happy to put $50 towards a "beer money" bounty for anyone who gets any kind of AGA X server running in NetBSD/current ;-p David