Re: netbsd-10, merging device-streams (xstreamtodev, rdbinfo)
Roc Vallès <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:21:59 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.amiga |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPq5wtZ5eZg=zMz4exjcRY1Nku+VmVXidxqYzaEfZtYPgneAZA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi David, Sent twice because I forgot to reply to all. My bad. On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 23:45, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > Does that seem reasonable? Yes. I imagine the reason only rdbinfo and xstreamtodev binaries were included before has to do with the install guide referencing exactly these two. > On a related note - could the README.md be updated to include a brief > note on each executable and what it does, plus a link back to your > github? This is no issue. I'll get this done in the repo shortly. Then it should be OK to just copy it over. > - Would anyone be interested in putting together a pkgsrc entry for > the tools to build device-streams? It would be nice to be able to > rebuild from any pkgsrc supporting box It would be nice to have. I do not know how hard this would be. Trying to run bebbo's script for preparing crossdev toolchain on netbsd would be a starting point. (I have only ever used Linux for AmigaOS crossdev) I might give it a try soon, on my previous x86 box (core2quad), where I have my x86 netbsd setup (which is 9.3 or a 10 snapshot, I haven't turned that machine on for months now). Expectation is for it to blow up but it needs to be attempted regardless. > - Would you be interested in dual licencing your changes under GPL and > BSD (I would need to Christian E. Hopps also, but wanted to ask here > first). I'm toying with the idea of adding a full copy of the actual > source properly in the NetBSD tree and it's generally encouraged to > have things available as BSD licence. (Note a "No" answer will result > in an "OK", rather than waving of hands and decrying that the world is > ending :) I am OK with GPL+BSD licensing my changes. > Once again, thanks for the work! Thank you again for looking into this. - Roc