Re: booting Beaglebone Black
Brook Milligan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jul 7, 2024, at 11:59 AM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > > The official 10.0 image just is too old for the change (and it is usually > not rebuild). But if you can verify the -10 images work, we can force > a one-time rebuild of the 10.0 images. Yes, 10.0 + uboot 2022.04 (and 2024.04) boots fine. I have not tested this with the armbsd images, e.g., by replacing the bootloader, but I have compiled plenty of my own systems with either 2022.04 or 2024.04 u-boot, and one is running fine right now. I see no downside to replacing the 10.0 image with one that boots. I think all that is needed is to run installboot on the existing image. If the image gets replaced, I’m happy to give it a spin; just let me know. Thanks. Cheers, Brook