Re: u-boot-marsboard package naming issue
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.user,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Z48sUxMy_cV_A-6a@picohive> |
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 02:27:24PM +1100, matthew green wrote: > Rui-Xiang Guo writes: > > Hi, > > I am going to create a u-boot package for the Embest MarS Board i.MX6Dual, > > but not sure if the naming is appropriate. > > There are another MarsBoard series with different SoCs from HAOYU. > > Should it follow the UBOOT_CONFIG (marsboard_defconfig), or add the suffix > > -imx6dl (although its FDT file is imx6q-marsboard.dtb)? > > i think i would rather have the -imx6dl suffix in the pkgsrc. > most seem to be in the form of "board-cpu", vs "cpu-board", > and it seems better to me for "u-boot-foo*" to match all the > "foo" boards, than having to glob before and after. (only > the "olinuxino" ones put the cpu before the board.) Thanks for the advice. In some special cases, such as Google's Coral Dev Board, do we need to use u-boot-coral-dev-board as the package name instead of u-boot-phanbell-imx8mq according to its configs - imx8mq_phanbell_defconfig? -rxg