Re: u-boot-marsboard package naming issue

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 01:10:43PM +0800, Rui-Xiang Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 02:27:24PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > Rui-Xiang Guo writes:
> > > Hi,
> > > I am going to create a u-boot package for the Embest MarS Board i.MX6Dual,
> > > but not sure if the naming is appropriate.
> > > There are another MarsBoard series with different SoCs from HAOYU.
> > > Should it follow the UBOOT_CONFIG (marsboard_defconfig), or add the suffix
> > > -imx6dl (although its FDT file is imx6q-marsboard.dtb)?
> > 
> > i think i would rather have the -imx6dl suffix in the pkgsrc.
> > most seem to be in the form of "board-cpu", vs "cpu-board",
> > and it seems better to me for "u-boot-foo*" to match all the
> > "foo" boards, than having to glob before and after.  (only
> > the "olinuxino" ones put the cpu before the board.)
> 
> Thanks for the advice.
> In some special cases, such as Google's Coral Dev Board, do we need to use
> u-boot-coral-dev-board as the package name instead of
> u-boot-phanbell-imx8mq according to its configs - imx8mq_phanbell_defconfig?

It seems there are two options:
a. Following its u-boot configs name
b. Using our own rule
I propose option a and leave the issue to u-boot himself.

BTW, when creating arm-trusted-firmware-imx, I noted
arm-trusted-firmware-sun50i-h6 and arm-trusted-firmware-sun50i_a64
Was one of them a typo?

-rxg