Re: uarea swap-out
Mike Pumford <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:05:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm26,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.acorn32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > matthew green <[email protected]> wrote: >> i'm really curious how this affects platforms with very >> few hardware pages, like acorn26. >> > > I cannot measure that empirically, therefore CC'ing port-acorn26 and > port-acorn32 lists. There are few points regarding this: > > - Merge of lwp_cache and uarea (it puts struct lwp, pcb and kstack together) > should have positive effect i.e. it would increase the utilisation of pages. > > - The criteria when LWP can be swapped-out is relatively strict i.e. there > are already many states when it cannot, see swappable() in uvm_glue.c. > > - If your machine starts swapping uareas, I think it is already quite a > hammer, especially for machines like acorn26/32. > > Newer patch removing uarea swap-out: > I'll give it a try on an acorn32 machine next weekend. I assume the patch is for a current kernel. Mike