Re: Proposal to fix booted_kernel on shark.
[email protected] Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:40:35 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> That sounds like making life hard for the many in order to make life > easier for the few. > > That's backwards in my opinion. Anyone doing a retrofit as you suggest > isn't going to be worried anywhere near as much about such an anomaly as a > normal day-to-day user, with a correctly installed system, who can't get > proper system dumps or whatever. > > Anyway, why would anyone installing a new kernel on an a.out system want > to install their kernel under any name other than "netbsd"? -- the patch > only removes a ".aout" extension if it is present. The case that mrg's comment made me worry about was this: start with a stock 1.5.x system (/netbsd is a.out) install /netbsd.aout from 1.6 to test retrofit boot disk:\netbsd.aout machdep.booted_kernel claims the OLD kernel was booted Is it safe to call printf() from ofw_device_register()? If we can add a status line to note that the kernel name is being changed, then I'm happy. BTW this is pullup-1-6 #1081, so if the consensus is that shark owners are expected to be clueful, that is fine too and I'll tell them to take it as is. -- Todd Whitesel toddpw @ toddpw.org