Re: pushing netbsd-5 (Was: bootloader)
"T. Makinen" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:01:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.atari |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:01 AM, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, T. Makinen wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Note sysinst doesn't have menu items for ATARITT and FALCON kernels. >>> >>> http://cvsweb.NetBSD.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/distrib/utils/sysinst/arch/atari/md.h?rev=1.18 >>> Should we have them or not? >> >> I guess it's better to have them aboard that not :) Another issue with > > Will test build (plus with further trimmed SMALL030 (BOOT)) with > updated sysinst kernel list before commit. > >> sysinst is when user wants to install sets from unmounted fs; installer by >> default doesn't use -G flag when it mounts filesystem. To make it work >> filesystem field must specified like "msdos -o -G" or filesystem should >> be mounted before extraction of sets starts and "local filesystem" method >> should be used; at least this must be documented. > > What is the difference between a Atari-Gemdos and MSDOS > filesystem, can it *always* be reliably determined by looking at > the MBR or similar? If so then maybe NetBSD should be handling > that auotmatically... Gemdos filesystem is quite similar to MSDOS, but there's some differences according to disktype project: http://disktype.sourceforge.net/doc/ch03s03.html At least bootsector has different marker. >> Whatever we do, maybe we should keep one kernel without RELOC_KERNEL >> because there's comment in atari/atari_init.c in line 151 saying that >> RELOC_KERNEL does not work on all TT's. > > For now I'm inclined to say that should be SMALL030 (until we > find someone with such a machine who is willing to test kernels > to work out why!) > > Hmm.. what would RELOC_KERNEL do on a machine with 2MB of TTRAM? I booted FALCON kernel with different TT-ram values (with loadbsd -T flag) and for a quick test at least kernel booted every time. However it would be nice to know what happens with real amount of 2MB TT-ram... I'm not sure how well NetBSD runs on 4/4MB machines - at least Frank's TT failed to boot NetBSD (with ATARITT kernel, but BOOTX worked). -Tuomo