Re: current status report at 20090204
KIYOHARA Takashi <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:38:52 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.bebox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! David, From: David Brownlee <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:54:53 +0000 (GMT) > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote: > > > + Xserver works on my bebox. > > > > patchs: > > ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kiyohara/xserver/ > > Excellent stuff - are there any plans to get this into the main > tree? Is it likely to break other ports? I have't plan to merge by myself. If you have bebox and test OK, then please commit. It is to influence only bebox and prep, perhaps. Both were tested by me. I am living to bebox and prep now. Moreover, s3 864 is not tested with other machines. However, no one might use an old card. > > * But our kernel(GENERIC) is more large. We support to boot only > > floppy-disk. You need to build for your customized tiny kernel > > after patch. > > Could bebox use the ustarfs boot which can span multiple floppies > as used by i386/space/alpha etc? hmmm... BeBox's BootROM(firmware) reads only BeFS and Old-BeFS. Also filename is kernel or kernel_joe. Our kernel makes from 'boot+netbsd' image. Thanks, -- kiyohara