RE: boot(8) for bebox
Tim Rightnour <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:56:16 -0700 (MST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.bebox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03-Apr-2008 KIYOHARA Takashi wrote: > I will split boot(8) of bebox into boot and boot_com0 now, I am trying. >=20 > However, I had forgotten CONS_BE existed in bebox. It is necessary to > depend on the VGA card in bebox, and to be booted by either of CONS_VGA > or CONS_BE. >=20 > I have not understood yet, and when BootROM of BeBox displays on the > screen maybe as "Be", I think that it boots with CONS_BE. What is cons_be? Is that more like a framebuffer console? I got rid of = the prep framebuffer console, as it was in really bad shape (looked like it w= as copied from bebox). What I really want to see some day in the future is = libsa containing enough rasops code so that a proper genfb driver can be writte= n inside a bootloader, and we use that instead. > Is boot_be necessary for us? > Or, do boot support both CONS_VGA and CONS_BE, and do it correspond wit= h > Vendor/Product ID of VGA? If you can somehow boot the machine and generate text output on the conso= le, I'd just get rid of it. The only reason to keep it would be if there was= no other way to get console output. --- Tim Rightnour <[email protected]> NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/ Genecys: Open Source 3D MMORPG: http://www.genecys.org/