Re: Firewire/USB Card for Qube 2

Evgueni Tzvetanov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.cobalt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Byron Servies <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Jun 6, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> 
> >> Puzzling, isn't it? And I do not have time (or
> >> knowledge) to track the things down the chain for
> this
> >> slowdown.
> >
> > First, Qube2 is much slower than modern x86
> machines, and
> > only "overmuscled" CPUs can saturate 100BaseTX
> network back in 1999.
> > For example, the Tulip Ethernet chip can't
> transfer receive packets
> > into unaligned DMA buffer and kernel has to copy
> all RX packets
> > from DMA buffer to mbufs.
> >
> > Second, implementation of network stack is too
> complicated and
> > we can't see which part (CPU, devices, drivers,
> VM, protocol layer,
> > checksumming, etc. etc) has bottleneck without
> proper benchmarks.
> >
> > I agree current NetBSD/mips implementation is not
> so optimized
> > for MIPS3 CPUS, though.
> 
> I would recommend performing the same test with the
> last official  
> Qube2 software release (still available on the Sun
> web site).  That  
> should be the performance benchmark, and it is as
> easy to set up as  
> our restore disks.  Perhaps easier, actually, given
> the web interface.
> 
> Byron
> 

I wish I have the time to do all these tests. But for
now as I replied to Tsutsui san my Qube 2 is doing a
great job as my router, firewall, Internet server and
many more and even slow, I still love it.

Thanks!
ET
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.