Re: Mounting SMB file system

Evgueni Tzvetanov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.cobalt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I have used NFS instead. I just installed Cygwin on the Windows servers/workstations and run the NFS service.
This worked for me much better than trying to mount SMB. Besides SMB is much more unstable than NFS.

Best!
ET


--- On Mon, 10/13/08, David Albert <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: David Albert <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Mounting SMB file system
> To: "Izumi Tsutsui" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, October 13, 2008, 1:32 PM
> Thank you Tsutsui-san!
> 
> Given how common the SMB file system is and how often
> cobalt NetBSD is used by home and small business users
> who typically have SMB file stores, do you think it would
> be worth having default SMBFS support in the next kernel
> release?
> 
> What do others think?
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> marconi: {17} mount_smbfs
> //dalbert@armstrong/Volume_1 /mnt/armstrong
> >> Password:
> >> mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no
> /dev/nsmb* device available)
> >>
> >> Has anyone been able to do this?
> >>     
> >
> > I have not tried it, but GENERIC kernel doesn't
> have SMBFS
> > and /dev/MAKEDEV doesn't create /dev/nsmb? nodes
> by default.
> >
> > You have to build a new kerenl with the following
> definitions:
> > ---
> > file-system	SMBFS
> > pseudo-device	nsmb
> > ---
> >
> > and then create /dev/nsmb? nodes:
> > ---
> > # (cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV nsmb)
> > ---
> > Izumi Tsutsui
> >
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.