Re: stability of Cobalt Qube 2
Andy Ruhl <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:55:13 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.cobalt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJcb3fo5mAASHGrMXA1S_-+rR01n3H8kWwbSAZoF_=VgPvQwXg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear list, > > I am a proud owner of a Cobalt Qube 2 (http://kennywest.blogspot.com/2010= /02/story-of-cobalt-qube.html) running Debian Squeeze. I want to use this a= s a NAS device for backing up various Linux machines on the network (I want= to do this using mondo over NFS). Apparently this proves more difficult th= an I thought (see also: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2012/03/msg0001= 5.html). Seems the Qube 2 dies under heavy network load. So whenever mondo = tries to upload the restore images to the NFS server, it starts to hang. Al= so tried using a newer network card (since there is a free PCI slot anyway)= , still the same issue. > So, I was wondering, what if I tried NetBSD, would this be more stable? A= re there people on this list using a Qube 2 reliably? My experience with the Qube2 is that it's very stable with NetBSD, but not fast for I/O. There was some issue with the PCI bus which impacted performance. If you search this list far enough back, you might find the details. I used mine for small jobs like DHCP server, internet gateway/firewall, and some other menial stuff until I got a Seagate Dockstar, which I use now. The Dockstar has it's issues with NetBSD as well. Andy