Re: stability of Cobalt Qube 2

Andy Ruhl <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:55:13 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.cobalt
Message-ID <CAJcb3fo5mAASHGrMXA1S_-+rR01n3H8kWwbSAZoF_=VgPvQwXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am a proud owner of a Cobalt Qube 2 (http://kennywest.blogspot.com/2010=
/02/story-of-cobalt-qube.html) running Debian Squeeze. I want to use this a=
s a NAS device for backing up various Linux machines on the network (I want=
 to do this using mondo over NFS). Apparently this proves more difficult th=
an I thought (see also: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2012/03/msg0001=
5.html). Seems the Qube 2 dies under heavy network load. So whenever mondo =
tries to upload the restore images to the NFS server, it starts to hang. Al=
so tried using a newer network card (since there is a free PCI slot anyway)=
, still the same issue.
> So, I was wondering, what if I tried NetBSD, would this be more stable? A=
re there people on this list using a Qube 2 reliably?

My experience with the Qube2 is that it's very stable with NetBSD, but
not fast for I/O. There was some issue with the PCI bus which impacted
performance. If you search this list far enough back, you might find
the details.

I used mine for small jobs like DHCP server, internet
gateway/firewall, and some other menial stuff until I got a Seagate
Dockstar, which I use now. The Dockstar has it's issues with NetBSD as
well.

Andy