Re: HP9000/425e support at Open Source unConference 2014 Kagawa
David Brownlee <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Apr 2014 18:31:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hp300,gmane.os.netbsd.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6pZnLjePdKgeL2LStBw1ktxn6+k8sHwdUFQ24qsJB2Mefg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 26 April 2014 18:01, Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> wrote: > abs@ wrote: > >> I wonder how feasible it would be to have rdesktop or a vnc client >> write directly to a wsfb() type framebuffer, or even via SDL to the >> same. Might make an '040 just about usable for a remote display. >> Certainly if I was able to use a 4MB 15Mhz 68020 based sun/50 as an X >> terminal we must be able to manage *something* :) > > The problem is both NetBSD kernel and Xorg server are > quite larger and require more CPU power than 1990's binaries. > IIRC NetBSD/sun3 1.1 kernel was only ~700KB, but in 6.1 it's > larger than 2MB. > > IIRC there is a wsfb driver for mplayer on x86, but I'm not sure > how much CPU power is required. If we can cut the X server out of the loop then I would hope it would be just about be fast enough for a demo. Probably not fast enough to be usable as a real device (unless someone wanted to prove a point :) >> Random thought - how much extra load would a twitter bot take? Each >> machine could have its own twitter account and respond to certain >> commands - uptime, df, uname, first part of dmesg. For bonus (and very >> very very slow) option could even tweet a bitmap for dmesg :-p > > The problem is the load of authentication via SSL. > Posting a tweet takes ~10 minutes on 68030 25MHz LUNA > via pkgsrc/net/ruby-tw. (though I have not tried it recently) Ouch. It should be possible to setup squid on a local machine to proxy http through to https for twitter. Providing no modification is required to the client (apart from ensuing it supports a standard proxy setup) then its arguably not even cheating :) > Most of my recent projects (Atari SMC_TT, hp300 wscons, > resurrection of luna68k and LUNA-II support, x86 liveimage, and > mlterm-fb etc) were driven by the events like Open Source Conference > and Kansai Open Source, as seen in the event page :-) I wonder if it might also be worth posting updates to a vintage computing list - I'm pretty sure there are people who would love to hear their beloved m68k CPUs are still on show :)