Re: Reanimating port hp700
Matt Thomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hp700 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 11:20 PM, Jochen Kunz wrote: > On 2003.09.18 11:03 Matt Thomas wrote: > >> Good news is that binutils seems to support hppa--netbsd. >> Bad news is that gcc doesn't support hppa--netbsd yet. > Yes. It said so when I attempted to compile a hppa--netbsd GCC3.x. ;-) >> (or hppa--openbsd). > OpenBSD has a GCC 2.95.3 and is running quite well with a staticly > linked world. (I instaled an OpenBSD-3.4 snapshot on my 715/100XC to > get in touch with the hardware.) I don't know how helpfull the OpenBSD > tools may be. [ABI woes] > I have no clue about this ABI woes. Any pointers to documentation > about this topic is welcome. > > Maybe I need to make clear: I have absolutely no clue about toolchain > internas, GCC hacking, subtile ABI differences, ... I am just trying > to reanimate port hp700. Unfortunately getting a toolchain is the > precondition that has to be solved. I am not interrested in toolchain > work. I am doing it only because nobody else is willing / has time to > do it. All I have at the moment is some time that I am willing to > donate. So I need some help to get the required knowledge. Additional > (future) problem: There are 64 bit hppa machines and possibly we need > an additional hppa64 port like sparc64 or the like. (?) We should keep > this in mind to avoid future 32 / 64 bit trouble. I'm willing to do the toolchain work (since at first glance it doesn't seem too difficult). I even have a snake to play with. :) -- Matt Thomas email: [email protected] 3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/ Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.