Re: Odd behavior in some terminal apps.
Wes Frazier <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:47:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hpcarm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/18/2017 21:43, Robert Swindells wrote: > Wes Fraizer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:26:42PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote: >>> >>> Wes Fraizer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:37:03PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Wes Frazier <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >I issued the 'ulimit -s 8192' command from bash and it appeared to >>> >> >execute without error. I then launched emacs, but it still triggered a >>> >> >segment fault. >>> >> >>> >> I have rebuilt emacs25-nox11, it works for me on a cats. >>> >> >>> >I ran a pkg_delete 'emacs25-nox11' and a 'pkg_add emacs25-nox11' and I >>> >continue to get a segment fault at launch with emacs. >>> >>> Are you sure that you downloaded the emacs25-nox11 package again ? >>> >>> I will try building tmux with debug symbols, would you be able to run >>> it under gdb to get an idea of why it is failing ? >> >> Im fairly confident it was the new package, I confirmed there was no >> emacs binary package in /usr/pkgsrc/packages before running pkg_add >> and >> saw the WiFi care lightup for a long time on the device as it was >> fetched. I can post a md5sum or some other hash of the binary. > > Ok. MD5 (/usr/pkg/bin/emacs) = 0216e50f5148bfecfd05d9043c521eaf > >> Is gdb in the base system? (cant check at work this second). If it is >> I >> should be able to muddle through that, if not would you mind building >> it? > > If you installed the comp tarball then you will have gdb. > > I have put a debug build of tmux at: > > <ftp://ftp.NetBSD.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/rjs/earmv4/tmux-2.5.tgz> I can confirm the debug build fails too, although I can't actually get it running in GDB. Every time I issue a "run" to gdb I get a "ptrace: No such proccess." I can succesfully backtrace emacs though. (Assuming we determine I am not using the old binary). Can you confirm if the MD5 sum matches the newer build? Sorry on the delay on getting around to this. I had some real life constraints that kept getting in the way of sitting down with the Jornada. Thanks for all your help so far. - Wes