Re: Current port status on J720?
Mark Kirby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hpcarm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 16 January 2006 11:41, [email protected] wrote: > Hi all, > > First post here :-) but I've been reading the archives a fair amount. > I think we need a sort-of-centralised resource to summarise what works and > what does not on the Jornada 720. It is my impression that this is the > device most of us here are using. > Note that I haven't installed NetBSD on it yet, but I'll list what seem to > work, as well as missing information: > > 1. booting the base system works OK Yes works fine. > 2. battery status is inaccurate (too high), unless a certain patch is > applied (http://nedbsd.nl/~ppostma/hpcarm-apm.diff) I havent tired an apn enabled kernel yet > 3. is the battery life similar to that achieved under HPC2000, or more > along the lines of what Linux (Debian or Familiar) gets (IME 20% shorter)? > 4. when suspending, I assume we are "only" slowing the CPU down to 59 Mhz > like Linux does, since that seems to be imposed by HPC's presence on the > device? > 5. Xhpc works as an X11R6 server. Maybe the X config file could be shared, > to help users save time. There is no config file as far as i can tell. > 6. touchscreen: I could not see confirmation in the archives, but I assume > this works fine in X? Touchscreen works fine > 7. how much space is required for the base system + X11 (without any > apps)? I've read 512MB could get tight with more than a couple of apps, > and 256MB would be pushing it. 512MB will be big enough for NetBSD + X and a few apps > 8. is the support for PCMCIA roughly the same as for other NetBSD ports, > i.e. is the J720 PCMCIA reader functional under NetBSD? PCMCIA support is the same for other ports > Anything I've missed out or forgotten, especially things that do not work > at the moment? > The on off key can be a bit tempermental at times. Sound does not work, other than that it seems to work ok. Though current is a bit troublesome at the moment so best to stick to stable version i think. Mark > Thanks, > > Michael -- The NetBSD CVS Digest http://digest.coris.org.uk