Re: Kde 1 or 2 on NetBSd 5.x
David Brownlee <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:40:09 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hpcmips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6pb475Z0zdvbUaTevshcOzAgbX85+0uoxFb=O1q6durJDw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 1 April 2015 at 16:58, Larry Stotler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: >> Absolutely - I've run X between at least mips, sparc, m68k, x86, vax, >> arm, alpha, m68k and sh3, though not anything like all at the same >> time :) > > That's what I thought. I just have never really had a reason to do > much remote desktop other than using RDP with Windows from Linux. Well, may be worth keeping a rdesktop client to hand, if for no other reason to confuse people by having a full screen Windows 8 (or 10) display on the Workpad when you have a net connection :) >> Its definitely a tradeoff. You're going to find the memory on the Z50 >> very limiting for any modern X ish task (apart from X terminal, or >> possibly rdesktop remote viewer) > > I've read that it MIGHT be possible to increase the Z50 to 64MB RAM. > The motherboard has 2 RAM chips and 2 open pads that could have RAM > chips. Further, Linux reads the onboard as 0-16MB and the SODIMM as > 33-64MB. So, IF I could find the correct chips and solder them in, it > MIGHT work. If anybody has managed to do it, I haven't been able to > find it. But a lot of stuff this old is starting to disappear from > the net...... :( Granted increasing from 48 to 64MB isn't much, but > it is 33% more, so it would help some. That was one reason I was > thinking of using an older version of BSD. KDE 1 ran well on 32MB of > RAM 16 years ago..... I remember setting up kde1 for someone on an old sparc2 to use to monitor the render queues from home while at Dreamworks. I also gave them a fvwm2 option, which after a little while they switched too exclusively for the extra speed. They still had the kde apps if they ever needed them... > If necessary I could use the built-in Pocket Word in the Windows CE > system(and probably will). Of course that's also a 16 year old > OS....... I'd say a very lightweight window manager to leave as much RAM as possible for whichever X editor you pick!