Re: ldt handling patch
Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:05:06AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > also lacks a check for 8192 upper bound (# of LDT segments), and > setting some values for the new segment. could that be consistent > with the symptoms? Only wine and some other things like it use the LDT. Normal processes don't, since we handle e.g. TLS via a GDT entry. Joerg