Re: ld vs. dkctl in netbsd-8

[email protected] (Louis Guillaume) writes:

>I just noticed this message in the console after a reboot:

>   raid2: get cache for component /dev/dk1 failed

>which is a bit troubling, considering I didn't get a similar message for 
>dk0, which is the other half of that raid1 pair (on raidframe).


The error comes from twe not implementing the DIOCGCACHE ioctl and
it should therefore appear for both components.

raidframe skips the test for components in the states 'spared',
'failed' and 'dist spared'. What does raidctl say?


-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: [email protected]
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."