Re: 3.3G RAM limit?
Mouse <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:02:41 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> I have a fuzzy memory that there's some kind of limit that leads to >> i386 topping out at three-point-something gigs of RAM. Could >> someone remind me of details? > It's got a single address space for user and kernel. Okay, that's one limit, but that doesn't explain the BIOS reporting only 3327M. Of course, I don't expect people here to know the intricacies of Dell's BIOS, but the fuzzy memory indicated there was some hardware basis for this. Perhaps that memory just got corrupted. > I can't remember if that impacts our memory size reporting (likely > not) but you will need to run in PAE mode if you want to address > anywhere near the full 4GB from non-kernel code. Well, cpuctl does report that the CPU is PAE-capable. I'd probably have to backport something, since the only PAE I see in this release is in Xen config files; I'll have to investigate and decide whether that's true, and if so whether it's worth the effort. But that sounds like a per-process VA limit. That's of less interest to me than 18.75% of the RAM apparently being completely unavailable regardless of how many different processes are involved. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B