Re: NetBSD-9 on 486DLC? (was Re: NetBSD-9 on 80486?)
ben bisel <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Aug 2021 12:43:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK8vzqeG-6PW76ON-xJQxY-GBNRWFodFQbu21bLN79BWwgUd5g@mail.gmail.com> |
John, I have NetBSD 4 installed on an Intel 486, and it works well. I recall about 5 years ago trying to install 6.1.4 on it as well, but I don't think I was even able to boot. I'll try a newer version and see what happens. I see you have 32MB of memory, which I have run 7 generic on before (different CPU though). Ben On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:17 AM John Klos <[email protected]> wrote: > I renamed the subject since this may be an issue with the 486DLC, but not > with 80486 in general. > > > Hmm, NetBSD 5.0 is the first release after i386 support was removed: > > > > http://gnats.netbsd.org/36163 > > > > Cx486DLC may not fully support i486 instructions. Linux seems to drop > > its support along with i386: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/11/131 > > The Cyrix and TI 486DLC support the atomic operations of the Intel 80486, > according to their datasheets, although I'm not > > "The LOCK prefix can be used with the following instructions: > Bit Test Instructions (BTS, BTR, BTC) > Exchange Instructions (XADD, XCHG, CMPXCHG) > One-operand Arithmetic and Logical Instructions > (DEC, INC, NEG, NOT) > Two-operand Arithmetic and Logical Instructions > (ADC, ADD, AND, OR, SBB, SUB, XOR)." > > Now I can't help but wonder what else might've changed... I'll keep trying > different things. > > Thanks! > John >