Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:50:40 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.NEB.4.64.2504241746490.1680@ugly> |
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:25:14PM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Manuel Bouyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:06:53PM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote: >>>> I've set this to port-i386 rather than port-xen as it's more about the x86 >>>> boot process rather than Xen. >>>> >>>> I have a (large) number of PV Xen VMs. These were created from a disk image >>>> built with makefs that the sets were extracted into. This means there is no >>>> partitioning except for disklabel and the root partition begins at sector 0: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> This all works fine, but I'm interested in others' alternatives suggestions. >>> >>> If you're running netbsd-10 you should be able to boot PVH the same way you >>> boot PV; just replace the XEN3_DOMU kernel with GENERIC >> >> Unfortunately not, you snipped out this bit: >> >>> Now that XenServer and XCP-ng no longer support PV booting (and >>> PV-on-PVH doesn't work either) [...] >> >> I would love to use PVH as it works brilliantly with the xl toolstck, but >> it's not an option with XenServer or XCP-ng. > > That PV-on-PVH doesn't work doesn't imply that PVH isn't working ... PVH simply isn't an option. The options for domain-type are only pv and hvm. On the very latest XenServer/XCP-ng, pv-in-pvh is an additional option which is the equivalent of pvshim: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10633/status-of-pvh -- Stephen