Re: Shared m68k packages (Was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k)
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:21:47 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.m68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 03:44:49 David Brownlee wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 16:37, Nathanial Sloss > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > [.. thread on buggy lc040 workaround ..] > > > > What I was after was a uniform approach to all m68k (buggy lc040's > > included). > > > > It makes me wonder even why we build different packages for sun, amiga, > > x68k, and mac68k also....when they are all m68k :( > > I'm sure jklos@ can correct me if I'm mistaken :-p but in general > pkgsrc builds share packages across all m68k platforms. If there was > sufficient additional compute available it is more likely we would > split builds by processor - eg '020 vs '040. > > There are differences mainly in /usr/include which will result in > small differences in generated binaries, but in general It Does Not > Matter which m68k platform was used to build the pkgsrc packages. > > A potentially interesting task would be to reduce those differences > for most (if not all) m68k userlands - probably starting with merging > /usr/include and then onto moving the small set of port specific > binaries to be triggered on m68k rather than the specific port :-p > Thanks for the background and info. Best regards, Nat > David