Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Greg Ungerer <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:59:53 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Geert, On 18/6/25 22:54, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 at 14:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 22:21 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >>>> Could you please elaborate this a bit more, please? >>>> >>>> Coldfire is handled as a separate target via TARGET_COLDFIRE in GCC, so we >>>> would certainly be able to toggle the alignment settings independent of >>>> what's done on classic m68k. >>> >>> The net out is that it is the same gcc compiler, m68k-linux-gcc. >>> ColdFire just needs specific code generation via command line switches, >>> like -m5200 (or -m5206e or -m5307 or -mcfv4e, etc). This is the same way >>> you would specify 680x0 level - m68020, -m68030, etc. >> >> Yes, but there is a TARGET_COLDFIRE macro as I mentioned above which could >> be used to trigger which alignment to use by default. I don't see how that >> would complicate things. >> >>> The bulk of the instruction set is the same. Asm code will look totally >>> familiar to anyone who knows m68k :-) One notable difference is that >>> there is a more limited set addressing modes for some instructions. >> >> True, but you won't be able to run any classic m68k binaries on ColdFire >> and the other way around, are you? > > IIIRC if you use a proper subset of the user mode instructions, you > can create binaries that run on both. You might be right on that. If you chose the lowest common denominator of ColdFire code generation, -m5200, then I seem to recall for user space that would just be a subset of traditional 68k. Regards Greg