Re: Little thought of today
Andy Ruhl <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:03:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.macppc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJcb3fpPeSvAZqxuWqDW1e60506PM2eGOeNt=RMKwis=YOd3fg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:26=E2=80=AFPM Umberto Cerrato <[email protected]= om> wrote: > > I think we macppc users have a big pro among other NetBSD users out there= (i386, amd64 users in example). We have a one big family of machines very = similar or identical among them. I am specifically talking about the G4 mac= s which probably are the most common machines. Maybe the "best" PowerPC Mac= s to run things on. > > Having a single big family means easier support, and a chance more if i.e= . something work fine on a G4 iBook should/could run fine on a G4 mac mini = too. > > We are somehow a bigger family compared to i.e. the many different x86 th= inkpad and other manufacturers machines. > > I came out with this thought after trying NetBSD on a Xeon computer and a= Pentium 4 and another more recent Intel machine and surprisingly the exper= ience has been the same and/or worse than the one with my beloved mac mini. > > But the difference is that with mac mini everything is easier. Since it i= s a so "well known" system, there is a solution. > While a random Xeon/Intel system may have a problem only few people may h= ave experienced already. > > So actually, since we are a well defined group, I think it is easier or t= here is more chance to have a working macppc _out of the box_ than a _rando= m_ x86/amd64 machine. > > In fact I noticed x86 netbsd people somehow had to make a sort of decisio= n about which of the many x86/amd64 systems to choose as "family"/reference= machine. Like the x2-- series thinkpads or t5--. > > Happy Easter Happy Easter to you as well. I never tried macppc. Do you have a particular favorite machine? I haven't had one in a very long time. The mini seems nice. Andy