Re: Missing X binary

David Brownlee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips.devel
Message-ID <CAGN_6pZ3VYz0-=2cjRWKu6wbXtfFbNEqczruXH9S27Lk6XDpCw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 19:39, Jonathan Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [... ]
>
> thanks very much for doing this!
>
> I can commit to testing on real hardware. It'll take a while, as I'm recovering from Covid and not well enough to move large stacks of DECstations and swap either CPU daughterboard or TC graphics. (NetBSD hasn't worked on r4k/r44k Decstations since about 1.4).
>
> Should one expect these Xserver/tc(4) changes to also work on TC Alpha?

Yes... though it's possible they may have the same uxterm issues (and
that would be very interesting to find out) - more in other thread.

Alpha still builds against Xorg 1.10, I think specifically to allow
the old tc drivers to work, but it includes xwsfb, so an Alpha kernel
with the cfb and other changes in the xwsfb-xorg.diff should just be
able to run a Xwsfb X server. I should probably open a second front in
Eastasia and try to build a set of 1.20 Alpha binaries for people on
port-alpha to test :-p

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.