Re: Committing code to evbmips?

Simon Burge <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jiaxun, Jason,

Jason Thorpe wrote:

> > On Nov 23, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Jiaxun Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently I submitted a patch fixing evbmips/malta platform, now it
> > can boot on both real hardware and QEMU.  I submitted the patch
> > on port-evbmips/57085 but didn't heard anything back, is it the
> > proper way to submit code for review?
> >
> > A little bit about my plan, after malta QEMU boot being fixed I
> > think we can add it to Anita and get some test coverage.  I'm a
> > student working part time for a company making MIPS processors so
> > I familiar with MIPS stuff and would like to expand evbmips port
> > to other platforms like MIPS Boston evaluation board and upcoming
> > MIPS VirtIO platform, probably start A new sub-port like evbmips/uhi
> > which act as a general evbmips target for all platforms using MIPS
> > UHI booting protocol (i.e.  Standardised FDT).
> >
> > After that I may look into supporting newer MIPS ISA releases like
> > MIPS R6, and improve N64 ABI usage in NetBSD.
> >
> > Any comments are appreciated.
>
> Hi Jiaxun - thanks for raising the flag on this one - I just reviewed
> at the patch, and it looks good to me.  I'll see about integrating it
> in the next day or two (unless simonb objects).

I saw this patch, but wanted to test on either a 4Kc or 25Kf Malta
first.  We've had problems with GXemul and real hardware behaving
subtly differently in the past.

I also have some code somewhere for Bonito support alongside existing
GT64120 support.  I should dig that out again.

I had wanted to get N64 using hardware FP by default instead of
softfloat.  I just haven't gotten around to that :/  I haven't
looked at R6 at all, nor really looked at UHI either.

Is there something active with a full "virt" QEMU target?  Reinoud
Zandijk did some work to add virtio support to the current MIPPSIM
target but I understand the QEMU folks didn't want to change mipssim but
add a new target.

Cheers,
Simon.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.