Re: CPUs that don't support LL/SC
"Toru Nishimura" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:37:18 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000701c23d46$00ef8f20$0d00a8c0@paq5> |
Simon Burge [email protected] wrote; > Could folks that know for sure that various models of MIPS cpus _don't_ > support the LL & SC instructions please update the table we have that > describes CPU capabilities? This involves adding the CPU_MIPS_NO_LLSC > flag in the cputab in sys/arch/mips/mips/mips_machdep.c. - I can not find out any reference mentioning TX39 core has LL/SC extension inside. (the R3000A variant does have cache instruction) - Toshiba's TX49 core document (dated Sept. 1998) describes LL/SC and LLD/SCD instructions in complete instruction coverage list. However, I can see an embarrassing statement in TMPR4955/4956 tentative document (dated 20-Oct.-1999); "TX4956 and TX4955 are not supporting the Load-Linked/Store-Conditional instruction sequence." The document does not explain what would happen when these TX49 processors try to run LL/SC instructions. Toru Nishimura/ALKYL Technology