Re: Binary packages for NetBSD/m68k 3.0 w/ pkgsrc-2006Q1
Greg Oster <[email protected]> Thu, 11 May 2006 07:29:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.amiga,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mac68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.m68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.news68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.next68k,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hp300,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tim & Alethea Larson writes: > Greg Oster wrote: > > After pushing a few of my m68k boxes[*] to build pkgsrc-2006Q1 for the > > past 40+ days, I'm happy to announce that I've finished uploading > > 1000+ packages to: > > > > ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc-2006Q1/NetBSD-3.0/m68k > > > > There is about 900MB of binary package goodness for m68k boxen, > > including fun things like KDE 3.5.1, gnumeric, and ImageMagick :) > > What, no Mozilla? :) I've got to chuckle at the idea of using some of > these on m68k...xscreensaver alone slows my box to a crawl. "I tried"... but it said something about not being available for m68k boxes :-/ > > And no, I havn't tested any of these... the only thing tested during > > this build was my patience for m68k boxes :) > > This is definitely appreciated! We haven't seen binary packages in a > long time. Too bad that SCSI issue in 3.0 on mac68k will likely prevent > anybody from using these. (Any other m68k people seeing this?) I certainly didn't see any SCSI issues on either of the Q700's or my SE/30.. and they got into some very heavy paging in those 40 days.... (65MB processes on a 20MB machine isn't much fun :-} ) > Packages for 2.1 would be useful for this reason too. > > Is there anything special required to build generic m68k packages as > opposed to mac68k/amiga/next68k/etc packages? Nope. Later... Greg Oster