Re: next68k port status?
gabriel rosenkoetter <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:06:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.next68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:03:02PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > I don't know, what's the problem with mac68k ? mac68ks lose a massive amount of time during disk access, because clock interrupts are at a lower--or the same?--priority as I/O interrupts, so they get postponed till after the I/O is done. My understanding is that this is true under any OS, but Mac OS shows it a bit less by cheating and guessing how long it took to do a disk access. > Here the date is always in 1932 when booting (which breacks a lot of things, > because it's a negative time_t) You sure that's not just a dead clock battery? -- gabriel rosenkoetter [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD) iD8DBQE/jbbp9ehacAz5CRoRArH6AJ9YM2N8f6t33ngwHNqhmq49D5K/YwCfezYo aDuBgWim8rpp4GQr9U/4OfE= =P2jJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----