Re: Status of the next68k port (SCSI controller/disk)?
Michael Engel <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:26:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.next68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, > On 25. Jan 2023, at 19:24, Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > I wrote: >=20 >> Well, my NeXTstation now has some trouble, maybe around >> the lithium battery for BIOS and powerup. I've ordered >> a new one and I'll commit fixes once after test them again. >> = https://industrial.panasonic.com/products/pt/lithium-batteries/models/BR-2= %25252F3A >=20 > Today I received a new battery and replaced it, > then my NeXT works again. :-) > (it complained "System test failed" and "Error code 65" first > but it dissappeared, maybe bad NVM values?) Bad NVM contents would be my guess, too.=20 > It turns out that the Ethernet issue on NetBSD/next68k 9.3 > is not a driver problem but looks due to lack of entropy issue > around the network layer. >=20 > Reverting the following pullup commit (especially "ip_do_randomid =3D = 0") > makes NetBSD/next68k 9.3 kernel boots on NFS root. > = https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/de6d2db7d06c8e3c0e35995722ebaa259b78c= 2ba#diff-8a50bc8e5e7080ceff91c3ac7e159fc046834f0dc2096a060a79bb122d38e717L= 171 That's interesting and it sounds like it was quite difficult to discover - thanks again for your work! I didn't have much time for testing recently, but will try to check this out, too. What would also be interesting is the state of NetBSD on=20 Turbo NeXT machines, I expect this to be more experimental... Best, Michael