Re: NetBSD/pc532 directions

Perry E. Metzger writes: 

> 
> Jon Buller <[email protected]> writes:
>> I'm not sure I want to bring this up, but... 
>>
>> Do we want to:
>> 1) Do the necessary work to make the PC532 work with /current again
>> 2) Leave a note saying that you should do a cvs co -D <whenever>
>>          if you want to get anything useful for it
>> 3) Just leave it all as it is to further bit-rot
> 
> I think we should decommission the port if it is not in working order
> by some given date -- I'd propose October 1. I don't like doing
> that, but if we can't have it fixed and working at some certain date
> in the future, clearly we aren't in a position to maintain this any more. 
> 
> Perry
 

Shame to see it go, as it's actually a distinct "architecture", as opposed 
to "yet another board that uses mips/arm/ppc/x86 with somewhat different 
I/O".