Re: ns32k toolchain
Ian Dall <[email protected]> 04 Aug 2002 23:10:34 +0930
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.pc532 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]> writes: > Ian Dall <[email protected]> writes: > > The 32081 and 32381 only impliment a subset of ieee fp. There are enough > > hooks to allow software emulation of the missing bits. Essentially, by > > default, the fpu traps on NaN, Inf, and denormal operands, divide by zero > > etc. If you want to get the right answers, you need to do the right thing > > with those traps, which is what my handler does. It does not do full > > fp emulation and will not suffice if you don't have a fpu, so it fills > > a different niche to a softfloat library. > > This is very similar to what many modern FPUs do, actually. The Alpha > port, for instance, handles things like denorms with a separate > library that Ross Harvey wrote. We might want to use the same library > code where possible across ports for this sort of thing. There is certianly some code which is machine independant, though I don't think it is as easilly seperated as I might hope. The current library for the pc532 is approximately: sibyl:-ieee-1.4 $ pc532-netbsd-size *.o text data bss dec hex filename 168 0 0 168 a8 ieee_dze.o 5288 4 88 5380 1504 ieee_handler.o 2392 0 0 2392 958 ieee_invop.o 496 0 0 496 1f0 ieee_ovfl.o 2632 4 0 2636 a4c ieee_subnormal.o ieee_handler.o is almost entirely machine dependant - instruction decoding, getting and setting fpu state etc. The rest, totalling roughly 50%, is mostly machine independent, but it is not as clean as I might hope. I think it would be hard to make the seperation cleaner without addtitional overhead. Ian