Re: Kernel must be compiled with the 2.95 toolchain?
Ed Schouten <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:51:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.playstation2 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool! When you reach binutils, let me know (I have some small other > patchset that should go in there, but does not apply to the old binutils > version) Guess I'll first port Binutils 2.9 and GCC 2.95.2 as clean as possible, because I first want to take a look at what's really different at those sourcetrees. There is a lot of cruft in the patched tree. I'll keep you informed about any progress :-) Yours, --=20 Ed Schouten <[email protected]> Dispuut Interlink - http://www.il.fontys.nl/ --huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB/WTeyx16ydahrz4RAs6VAKDRDmE1Ixe4KBKmss/3YtSvfabJYQCgld/O 0Xx3by/MPabC5dPi76sm0Dk= =vcFk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ--