Re: Is pmax alive?
Felix Deichmann <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:10:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.pmax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 05.03.2016 um 23:53 schrieb Tobias Nygren: > Boot: 0/rz0/netbsd > 4241136+131984 [236752+233661]=0x49ee94 > Starting at 0x80030000 > > segment 0 start 00000000 size 04800000 > segment 1 start 06000000 size 00800000 > phys segment: 0x4800000 @ 0 > adding 0x32f000 @ 0x4d1000 to freelist 1 > adding 0x4000000 @ 0x800000 to freelist 0 > phys segment: 0x800000 @ 0x6000000 > adding 0x800000 @ 0x6000000 to freelist 0 > pmap_steal_memory: seg 0: 0x4d1 0x4d1 0x800 0x800 > pid 0(system): trap: cpu0, address error (load or I-fetch) in kernel mode > status=0x80010, cause=0x30000010, epc=0x8000001c, vaddr=0xdeadbeef > tf=0x804d0cf0 ksp=0x804d0d90 ra=0x80174df4 ppl=0 > kernel: address error (load or I-fetch) trap > Stopped in pid 0.1 (system) at 8000001c: lw k1,0(k1) > db> That is also what I found in the mailing list archive for a 5000/25 and a 5000/240 (screenshot): http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-pmax/2014/03/03/msg000158.html http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-pmax/2014/05/13/msg000165.html Following the first thread, it was suggested that pmax is broken since MIPS64 merge (so even NetBSD 6.x was/is broken)... It would be great if this long-standing issue could be fixed finally, our DEC machines deserve it! :) Felix