Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats
Björn Johannesson <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.alpha,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.pmax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello. -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 3/10/19, Maxime Villard <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats To: "Bj=C3=B6rn Johannesson" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Date: Sunday, March 10, 2019, 12:16 PM =20 Le 10/03/2019 =C3=A0 11:25, Bj=C3=B6rn Johannesson a =C3=A9crit : >> Hello. >> >> COMPAT_ULTRIX (mips) works fine which I recently discovered after shuff= ling >> some disks and NetBSD8 mounted the ULTRIX disk as / =20 >This more likely means that it was an old UFS disk that we do support by >default in our UFS/FFS code, but I hardly seehow this could be related to= COMPAT_ULTRIX. What I meant was that it mounted the ULTRIX root disk and proceeded to run = init going into multiuser with NetBSD kernel and ULTRIX userland. =20 >Which MIPS are you talking about by the way? >Pmax I guess? Because COMPAT_ULTRIX is disabled on the majority of our MI= PSs. Yes (DECstation 5000/240) >> Not that I have terribly much use for it (except maybe maple) but I wou= ld >> still like it to be kept in. =20 >I would tend to think that a good reason needs >to go a bit farther than just >"I'd like to keep it in"... =20 >When it comes to Maple, it is already available on Linux, and we do have >COMPAT_LINUX. Perhaps, but I do not have maple on Linux, only for ULTRIX/mips. /B