Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats

Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Mar 2019 09:32:23 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.pmax,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]>

> On Mar 16, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Maxime Villard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anyway, people, let's wrap it up. The status right now is that I've =
disabled
> COMPAT_OSF1 on Alpha, and I'm not sure if there is an improper =
dependency of
> COMPAT_LINUX on COMPAT_OSF1, because I see calls like osf1_sys_wait4 =
in
> sys/compat/linux/arch/alpha/, but there is no dependency in the =
modules.
>=20
> Right now I'm waiting to see if the build cluster fails, to know for =
sure.
> If there is indeed a dependency, we'll have to untangle it before =
retiring
> COMPAT_OSF1. I don't think it is really complicated, the functions =
used are
> just wrappers, that we can easily move into Alpha's COMPAT_LINUX.

Ah, yes, Linux... When Linux was brought up on Alpha, they tried to make =
the system call ABI compatible with OSF/1's ... that's just the way =
Linux was done back in those days... I don't know if it's still the =
case, and I don't honestly know how much utility COMPAT_LINUX has on =
Alpha, either.  Linux is a "high-touch" emulation ... stuff that should =
be platform-independent "leaks" out into arch-dependent code in Linux, =
so making it work is a lot more than just doing the exec glue and signal =
trampolines -- sometimes you have to have completely alternate =
implementations of some system calls.

-- thorpej