Compiler speeds (was: why do we do it)

Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.current,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.pmax
Organization The NetBSD Project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday, 22 August 2005 at  1:35:23 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, George Michaelson wrote:
>
>> From memory, in 1982 the time to recompile 4.1BSD on a 780 was 2 days.
>>
>> So we've not done too badly to move on up to a week in over 20 years.
>
> Umm, given that it now takes slightly over a week to compile the whole
> shebang on a VAX-8650, that would be about six or seven weeks on an
> 11/780...
>
> 4.3 Reno compiled blindingly fast in comparision on the same
> hardware.

I once started building a cross-compiler suite for 2.11BSD.  I never
finished, but I got close enough to estimate how long a "make world"
would take: about 10 seconds on a 133 MHz Pentium.  That's partly
because of the smaller size of the 2.11BSD distribution, but mainly
because the compilers were much faster: they had to be.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDCRw0IubykFB6QiMRAgGIAJ976/MnvU1SoIeFFXTmemUYJ8Rn4QCggkGF
trViSkvOyaGrngvp2pTiVlM=
=qB94
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.