Re: Recommendations for small NetBSD network box

Andy Ruhl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips.devel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <CAJcb3frx55eeqfNHSeEFbdunYFWLEpyi12u242b1ziie2-EvrQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Apologies for cross posting to three pretty generic CPU lists, but I'm
> hoping the answer lies with the expertise reading this now :)
>
> I'm looking for a small box to act as a NAT & low traffic VPN device.
>
> Requirements are pretty simple:
> - At least two Ethernet interfaces (100base fine)
> - Enough RAM to to run NAT (probably pf), and IPSEC or OpenVPN
> (fortunately not both) for up to about 50 web (or weblike) clients &
> sshd
> - Small (sub mini-itx), and cased (looks like a product)
> - USB port to plug in a 3G dongle would be nice.
>
> I could obviously easily find something running Linux, but I'd prefer
> to have it running NetBSD.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions?

I'm running NetBSD-current and ipsec between 2 Seagate Dockstar
machines. I have not tried pf or using this machine as a gateway, but
I need to at some point. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work.

The Dockstar doesn't meet your requirement for ethernet ports, but
they have 3 USB ports so you might be able to make up for it. I
haven't tried a wired ethernet adapter in it yet, but I have used a
wifi adapter.

They only have 128 megs of memory. This seems like plenty for what I'm
doing but I suppose it would be small for some production
environments.

Andy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.