Re: Recommendations for small NetBSD network box
Andy Ruhl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips.devel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJcb3frx55eeqfNHSeEFbdunYFWLEpyi12u242b1ziie2-EvrQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologies for cross posting to three pretty generic CPU lists, but I'm > hoping the answer lies with the expertise reading this now :) > > I'm looking for a small box to act as a NAT & low traffic VPN device. > > Requirements are pretty simple: > - At least two Ethernet interfaces (100base fine) > - Enough RAM to to run NAT (probably pf), and IPSEC or OpenVPN > (fortunately not both) for up to about 50 web (or weblike) clients & > sshd > - Small (sub mini-itx), and cased (looks like a product) > - USB port to plug in a 3G dongle would be nice. > > I could obviously easily find something running Linux, but I'd prefer > to have it running NetBSD. > > Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm running NetBSD-current and ipsec between 2 Seagate Dockstar machines. I have not tried pf or using this machine as a gateway, but I need to at some point. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work. The Dockstar doesn't meet your requirement for ethernet ports, but they have 3 USB ports so you might be able to make up for it. I haven't tried a wired ethernet adapter in it yet, but I have used a wifi adapter. They only have 128 megs of memory. This seems like plenty for what I'm doing but I suppose it would be small for some production environments. Andy