Re: MKSOFTFLOAT for evbppc
Mouse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On a P2020, a build.sh distribution for evbppc took 6.2% less time on a soft$ Please try to avoid paragraph-length lines. Compensating manually, > On a P2020, a build.sh distribution for evbppc took 6.2% less time on > a softfloat userland .vs. hardfloat userland with kernel-emulation. I'm not surprised there's a difference; they're basically doing the same thing, except one of them is paying trap-to-the-kernel overhead. I'm surprised the difference is that great; a build of the world must be doing a lot more floating-point than I realized. Did you do multiple runs to find out how the difference compares to the noise? /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B